Skip to content
EMPOBase
en

Grant ledger vs statutory accounts: why you may need both

By the EMPOBase team · · 4 min read

Short answer

A grant ledger tracks money by project, grant and fund so you can report to each donor. Statutory accounts follow the accounting and legal rules of your country and are filed with authorities and used for the annual audit. They answer different questions, so many NGOs keep both and reconcile them at period end. Ask your accountant which rules apply to you.

Key points

  • A grant ledger answers donor questions: what was spent on which grant, and what is left.
  • Statutory accounts answer legal questions: what the organization owns and owes under local rules.
  • Both should total to the same cash and costs; differences must be explained, not ignored.
  • Your accountant owns the statutory books; your finance team owns the grant view.

What is a grant ledger?

A grant ledger is a set of accounts organized around your funding. Each entry shows not only the type of cost but also the project, the grant, the budget line and the fund it belongs to. Its purpose is to answer questions such as:

  • How much of Grant A has been spent, and on what?
  • How much of it is committed but not yet spent?
  • Which money is restricted, and which is free to use?
  • What can we report to the donor this quarter?

It is built for management and for donors.

What are statutory accounts?

Statutory accounts are the formal financial statements an organization must keep under the law and accounting standards of its country. They are usually prepared by an accountant, audited by an external auditor and filed with an authority. They answer questions such as:

  • What does the organization own and owe?
  • What was its total income and expenditure for the year?
  • Did it follow the rules for its legal form?

Their rules vary by country and by type of organization, and you should always check which apply to you. Some use recognized standards, but the details of what applies are a matter for your accountant.

Why do the two look different?

Each is built for a different reader. A donor wants to know what happened to one grant, in the donor’s categories. An authority wants a complete picture of the whole organization, in the legal categories.

Grant ledgerStatutory accounts
Main readerDonors, managersAuthorities, auditors, board
Main questionWhat happened to this grant?What is the organization’s position?
Organized byProject, grant, fund, budget lineLegal account structure
Rules fromGrant agreementsLaw and accounting standards
Prepared byFinance teamAccountant or finance lead

When do you need both?

Most NGOs with several restricted grants do. A single donor-driven view cannot give the complete legal picture. A purely statutory view hides which money belongs to which grant, and you cannot report to a donor from it without extra work.

Common triggers for keeping both:

  • You have more than one restricted grant.
  • Donors need reports in their own budget lines.
  • You file annual accounts with an authority.
  • Your auditor reviews both donor-specific and organization-wide figures.

If you have only one funder and a small budget, your accountant may suggest one set of books with grant tags. Ask before you decide.

How do you keep the two in agreement?

The two sets should agree on the facts: cash received, cash spent and balances. They may differ in classification and timing. Keep them in line with a simple routine:

  1. Agree a mapping between the grant ledger’s accounts and the statutory accounts.
  2. Reconcile each period. Compare total income, total spending and bank balance in both.
  3. List differences with a cause, such as timing or a donor-specific rule.
  4. Clear them or carry them forward with a note.
  5. Have a second person review the reconciliation.

A mapping that is written down saves days during the annual audit. Our chart of accounts guide helps you design one that maps cleanly.

What goes wrong when the two drift apart?

  • Donor reports show a cost that the statutory books classify differently, and nobody can explain why.
  • The audit finds a gap between the grant view and the financial statements.
  • A restricted balance in the grant view is spent in the statutory view.
  • Exchange-rate differences build up with no owner.

Each is avoidable with a regular reconciliation.

Where EMPOBase fits

EMPOBase’s General Ledger is a double-entry ledger built around projects, grants and restricted funds, with budget vs actual, bank reconciliation, period closing and financial statements. It is not statutory accounting: it does not compute local tax or social contributions and does not produce country filing formats. Keep your statutory books with your accountant, and use EMPOBase for the grant and project view that donors ask for. Our page on operations software for NGOs shows where the line is.

Questions people ask

Can one system do both jobs?

Sometimes, if it supports the grant dimensions you need and the statutory rules in your country. Check with your accountant and your auditor. Do not assume a grant ledger meets legal filing needs.

Why do the two sets of figures differ?

Timing, cost classification, exchange rates and donor-specific rules can differ. A reconciliation lists each difference and its cause.

Who decides which rules apply?

Laws and standards differ by country and by legal form. Your accountant and auditor should tell you, and you should check with the authority where you are registered.